Calculating Impacts¶
Overview¶
Once you've found an activity using search_activities, you can calculate its environmental impacts using the calculate_standard tool. This guide shows you how to run LCA calculations and interpret results.
Basic Calculation Workflow¶
The Three-Step Process¶
Every LCA calculation follows this pattern:
- Search for an activity → Get activity code
- Calculate using the code → Get task_id
- Check status until complete → Get results
Step 1: Search for Activity¶
Prompt:
Result: You get an activity code (e.g., abc123def456...)
Step 2: Calculate Impact¶
Prompt:
What Happens:
- Tool: calculate_standard
- Database: ecoinvent-3.11-cutoff
- Activity code: abc123def456...
- Quantity: 1000
- Method: ecoinvent-3.11 > IPCC 2013 > climate change > global warming potential (GWP100)
Step 3: Get Results¶
The AI automatically checks the calculation status and returns:
Example Result:
✅ Calculation Complete
Activity: Solar PV electricity, 3kWp rooftop
Quantity: 1000 kWh
Impact: 45.2 kg CO2-eq
Method: IPCC 2013 GWP100
Database: ecoinvent-3.11-cutoff
Calculation time: 2.3 seconds
Impact Methods¶
Climate Change Methods¶
The most commonly used impact category:
| Method | Full Specification | Unit |
|---|---|---|
| IPCC 2013 GWP100 | ecoinvent-3.11 > IPCC 2013 > climate change > global warming potential (GWP100) |
kg CO2-eq |
| IPCC 2021 GWP100 | ecoinvent-3.11 > IPCC 2021 > climate change > global warming potential (GWP100) |
kg CO2-eq |
Prompts:
"Calculate carbon footprint using IPCC 2013"
"Calculate GHG emissions with IPCC 2021"
"Calculate climate change impact"
Method Versions
IPCC 2021 includes updated characterization factors. Use IPCC 2013 for consistency with earlier studies.
Other Impact Categories¶
EcoSemantic supports many impact assessment methods:
Acidification
Specification:ecoinvent-3.11 > CML 2001 > acidification > acidification potential
Eutrophication
Specification:ecoinvent-3.11 > ReCiPe 2016 midpoint (H) > freshwater eutrophication > eutrophication potential (FEP)
Human Toxicity
Specification:ecoinvent-3.11 > USEtox 2.1 > human toxicity > human toxicity potential
Water Scarcity
Specification: ecoinvent-3.11 > AWARE 1.2 > water availability > water availability footprint
Finding Methods
Use search_methods to discover available impact assessment methods:
Quantity and Units¶
Understanding Functional Units¶
The quantity parameter defines how much of an activity you want to analyze.
Examples:
| Activity | Unit | Quantity | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Electricity production | kilowatt hour | 1000 | 1000 kWh of electricity |
| Steel production | kilogram | 500 | 500 kg of steel |
| Car transport | kilometer | 100 | 100 km of driving |
| Product manufacturing | unit | 1 | 1 product item |
Scaling Calculations¶
Prompts:
"Calculate for 1 kWh" → Single unit
"Calculate for 1000 kWh" → Scaled up
"Calculate for 0.5 kg" → Fractional amounts
The results scale linearly with quantity.
Prompt Examples by Sector¶
Energy Sector¶
Solar Energy:
"Calculate the carbon footprint of 1000 kWh of solar PV electricity from Spain
using IPCC 2013 GWP100"
Wind Energy:
Natural Gas:
Manufacturing Sector¶
Steel Production:
Aluminum Production:
Plastic Manufacturing:
Transportation Sector¶
Passenger Car:
"Calculate carbon footprint of a 100 km passenger car trip
with a medium-size diesel vehicle EURO 6"
Freight Truck:
Aviation:
Agriculture Sector¶
Crop Production:
Livestock:
Multi-Impact Analysis¶
Comparing Impact Categories¶
Prompt:
AI Will: 1. Run calculation for climate change (IPCC 2013) 2. Run calculation for acidification (CML 2001) 3. Run calculation for eutrophication (CML 2001) 4. Present results in a comparison table
Result Interpretation¶
Example Output:
Impact Assessment for Coal Electricity (1000 kWh):
Impact Category | Value | Unit
------------------------|------------|-------------
Climate Change | 950 kg | CO2-eq
Acidification | 2.3 kg | SO2-eq
Freshwater Eutrophication | 0.15 kg | P-eq
Understanding Results¶
LCA Score Components¶
Each result includes:
| Component | Description | Example |
|---|---|---|
| lca_score | Numerical impact value | 45.2 |
| unit | Impact unit | kg CO2-eq |
| method | Assessment method used | IPCC 2013 GWP100 |
| activity | Process analyzed | Solar PV electricity |
| quantity | Amount analyzed | 1000 kWh |
| calculation_time | Processing duration | 2.3 seconds |
Interpreting Units¶
Common impact units:
- kg CO2-eq - Carbon dioxide equivalents (climate change)
- kg SO2-eq - Sulfur dioxide equivalents (acidification)
- kg P-eq - Phosphorus equivalents (eutrophication)
- CTUh - Comparative toxic units for humans (toxicity)
- m³ water-eq - Water equivalents (water use)
- MJ surplus - Energy surplus (resource depletion)
Comparative Analysis¶
Comparing Activities¶
Prompt:
"Search for solar and coal electricity activities,
calculate their carbon footprints for 1000 kWh each,
and compare the results"
AI Will: 1. Search for both activity types 2. Calculate impacts separately 3. Create comparison table 4. Highlight differences
Example Result:
Comparison: Solar vs Coal Electricity (1000 kWh)
Technology | Carbon Footprint | Difference
-----------|------------------|------------
Solar PV | 45 kg CO2-eq | Baseline
Coal | 950 kg CO2-eq | +2011%
Solar electricity has 95% lower carbon footprint than coal.
Scenario Analysis¶
Prompt:
"Calculate carbon footprint for electricity production
using natural gas, and show how it changes if we scale
from 1000 to 10000 kWh"
Advanced Calculation Techniques¶
Using Method Validation¶
Before calculating, validate the method exists:
Prompt:
"Validate that IPCC 2013 GWP100 exists in ecoinvent-3.11-cutoff,
then calculate carbon footprint for solar electricity"
Calculation History¶
Review past calculations:
Prompt:
Getting Statistics¶
Track your usage:
Prompt:
Common Issues and Solutions¶
Issue 1: Method Specification Error¶
Error Message:
Solution:
Issue 2: Calculation Timeout¶
Error Message:
Solution: - Complex calculations take longer - Check status again: "Check the status of task [task_id]" - Usually completes within 10-30 seconds
Issue 3: Activity Code Not Found¶
Error Message:
Solution:
Best Practices¶
✅ DO¶
- Specify exact method specifications
- Use appropriate quantities with correct units
- Compare similar functional units (don't compare 1 kg steel vs 1000 kWh electricity)
- Check calculation status if it takes > 10 seconds
- Save important results for documentation
❌ DON'T¶
- Mix databases (activity from 3.9.1, method from 3.11)
- Use negative quantities
- Expect instant results for complex systems
- Compare incompatible units
Complete Workflow Examples¶
Example 1: Energy Comparison Study¶
Full Conversation:
You:
"I want to compare the carbon footprint of different electricity sources
for 1 MWh of electricity using IPCC 2013 GWP100"
AI:
I'll help you compare different electricity sources. Let me search for:
1. Solar PV
2. Wind
3. Natural gas
4. Coal
[Searches and calculates for each]
Results for 1 MWh (1000 kWh):
Source | Carbon Footprint | Ranking
--------------|------------------|--------
Solar PV | 45 kg CO2-eq | 1 (Best)
Wind | 12 kg CO2-eq | 1 (Best)
Natural Gas | 490 kg CO2-eq | 3
Coal | 950 kg CO2-eq | 4 (Worst)
Wind energy has the lowest carbon footprint, followed closely by solar.
Fossil fuels have 10-80x higher impacts.
Example 2: Transportation Analysis¶
You:
"Calculate the carbon footprint of commuting 50 km daily for a year
(250 working days) using a medium diesel car"
AI:
Total distance: 50 km/day × 250 days = 12,500 km
[Searches for medium diesel passenger car]
[Calculates for 12,500 km]
Annual Commute Carbon Footprint:
- Distance: 12,500 km
- Vehicle: Medium diesel car, EURO 6
- Impact: 2,890 kg CO2-eq (2.89 tonnes CO2-eq)
This is equivalent to:
- Approximately 6,420 kWh of coal electricity
- Or flying ~5,780 km
Example 3: Product Manufacturing¶
You:
AI:
[Searches for recycled aluminum activity]
[Calculates multiple impact categories]
Environmental Profile: 1000 kg Recycled Aluminum
Impact Category | Value | Unit
-------------------------|-----------|-------------
Climate Change | 890 kg | CO2-eq
Acidification | 3.2 kg | SO2-eq
Eutrophication | 0.28 kg | P-eq
Human Toxicity | 15.3 | CTUh
Resource Depletion | 245 MJ | surplus energy
Key Finding: Recycled aluminum has ~95% lower climate impact
than primary aluminum production.
Next Steps¶
Now that you know how to calculate impacts:
- Explore Data - Discover more methods and data
- Examples - See complete real-world use cases
Related Tools¶
- calculate_standard - Full tool documentation
- get_task_status - Check calculation status
- search_methods - Find impact methods
- validate_method - Verify method specifications
Ready to explore more? Check out Exploring Data →